Skip to content
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Slate)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

DT125R FORUM

  1. Home
  2. Technical Zone
  3. Engine
  4. High Compression Questions

High Compression Questions

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Engine
11 Posts 3 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NINJAN Offline
    NINJAN Offline
    NINJA
    wrote on last edited by NINJA
    #1

    I have spotted a RS125/Rotax 122 engine for sale, with the listing stating that the engine has been rebuilt with a 140cc Italkit and the crank has been rebuilt too. There's most likely a new con-rod in there as well, which would justify the cost of the crank rebuilding. However, the seller states that the engine has a high compression of over 140psi. He has a video of the test and also one of the engine running, so I'm curious to find out the following;

    1. Is 140psi normal?
    2. Is that psi acceptable or not?
    3. What would cause the compression to be too high?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drz8WtfLYCM

    SEDUCED BY THE DARK SIDE!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CalumC Offline
      CalumC Offline
      Calum
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Okay, well I'd be wary about buying stuff from people who don't really know what they're on about.

      There is having high compression, then there is having a high compression ratio.

      These are two different things.

      High compression is just telling you that the engine is healthy. No blowby past the rings, the head gasket is sealing and it's all working as intended.

      High Compression Ratio, is the volume swept over the squish. The higher this value, the more power you're likely to make, but the higher the risk of detonation.

      It's the latter you really want to understand.

      Always Originate, Never Pirate!

      NINJAN 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • CalumC Calum

        Okay, well I'd be wary about buying stuff from people who don't really know what they're on about.

        There is having high compression, then there is having a high compression ratio.

        These are two different things.

        High compression is just telling you that the engine is healthy. No blowby past the rings, the head gasket is sealing and it's all working as intended.

        High Compression Ratio, is the volume swept over the squish. The higher this value, the more power you're likely to make, but the higher the risk of detonation.

        It's the latter you really want to understand.

        NINJAN Offline
        NINJAN Offline
        NINJA
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Calum Thanks for the advice, I asked around on the FB RS groups and got replies of 120-160psi is the average range. With 150psi being pretty much the optimal pressure. So it appears that your comments of the current owner not knowing what he's on about, as being on the mark.

        Oh decisions - decisions!!! :confused_face:

        SEDUCED BY THE DARK SIDE!!!

        CalumC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • NINJAN NINJA

          @Calum Thanks for the advice, I asked around on the FB RS groups and got replies of 120-160psi is the average range. With 150psi being pretty much the optimal pressure. So it appears that your comments of the current owner not knowing what he's on about, as being on the mark.

          Oh decisions - decisions!!! :confused_face:

          CalumC Offline
          CalumC Offline
          Calum
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @NINJA My advice would be to just build your own engine to the spec you want.

          The last Rotax engine I bought had "Recently" been rebuilt.

          When I stripped it I found that the little bearing was missing a few needles, and that it was generally pretty worn. Barrel scored etc.

          It just comes back to bite you.

          You really want that compression ratio dialed in to how you want to ride the bike.

          Always Originate, Never Pirate!

          declanD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • CalumC Calum

            @NINJA My advice would be to just build your own engine to the spec you want.

            The last Rotax engine I bought had "Recently" been rebuilt.

            When I stripped it I found that the little bearing was missing a few needles, and that it was generally pretty worn. Barrel scored etc.

            It just comes back to bite you.

            You really want that compression ratio dialed in to how you want to ride the bike.

            declanD Offline
            declanD Offline
            declan
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Yep gotta agree with Calum if you wants something doing right do it yourself don’t trust strangers to tell the truth

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • NINJAN Offline
              NINJAN Offline
              NINJA
              wrote on last edited by NINJA
              #6

              Thanks for the advice and although I have to agree with you both, I decided to go ahead and bought it. I got it for a decent price and my thinking is that the parts alone are worth the value, as I will have a spare engine to work on, whilst I have a running bike to enjoy. The engine has been rebuilt but not yet run-in, so the parts should be virtually 'new'? Only an internal inspection will confirm that, but even if I just end up with spare parts I will have a full set at my disposal.

              Anyways I've paid for it now so we'll see what she's like when it arrives, but my first job is to give her a damn good clean!!!

              0_1543242633288_Rotax 122 Engine-15.jpg

              SEDUCED BY THE DARK SIDE!!!

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • NINJAN Offline
                NINJAN Offline
                NINJA
                wrote on last edited by NINJA
                #7

                Well she cleaned up nicely and now looks much better now and the internals look really good too;

                IMG_2556.JPG

                IMG_2557.JPG

                IMG_2560.JPG

                IMG_2553.JPG

                IMG_2558.JPG

                The piston looks good and is unmarked;

                IMG_2563.JPG

                The barrel is very clean with no signs of any scours;

                IMG_2568.JPG

                Rebuilt crank and what looks like new bearings too;

                IMG_2566.JPG

                Sadly I did not do enough research before buying this motor, as I will need a lot more parts from the RS, (Loom, switches etc) and also the flywheel is a lot heavier for the electric start to crank her up. This will reduce overall performance slightly, due to it being heavier rotational mass and added weight to the bike overall due to all of the electric start components. Which all means a major expense all just to get the electric start to work. Plus I have also discovered that my MX frame will have to be altered in-order for this lump to fit in. Mainly due to the starter motor's location and slightly different engine mounts. So it's a lesson learned the slightly hard way on this one, but all is not lost as I am now going to respray her and sell her on - TBC..............................................

                SEDUCED BY THE DARK SIDE!!!

                CalumC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • NINJAN NINJA

                  Well she cleaned up nicely and now looks much better now and the internals look really good too;

                  IMG_2556.JPG

                  IMG_2557.JPG

                  IMG_2560.JPG

                  IMG_2553.JPG

                  IMG_2558.JPG

                  The piston looks good and is unmarked;

                  IMG_2563.JPG

                  The barrel is very clean with no signs of any scours;

                  IMG_2568.JPG

                  Rebuilt crank and what looks like new bearings too;

                  IMG_2566.JPG

                  Sadly I did not do enough research before buying this motor, as I will need a lot more parts from the RS, (Loom, switches etc) and also the flywheel is a lot heavier for the electric start to crank her up. This will reduce overall performance slightly, due to it being heavier rotational mass and added weight to the bike overall due to all of the electric start components. Which all means a major expense all just to get the electric start to work. Plus I have also discovered that my MX frame will have to be altered in-order for this lump to fit in. Mainly due to the starter motor's location and slightly different engine mounts. So it's a lesson learned the slightly hard way on this one, but all is not lost as I am now going to respray her and sell her on - TBC..............................................

                  CalumC Offline
                  CalumC Offline
                  Calum
                  wrote on last edited by Calum
                  #8

                  @NINJA Flywheel acts as an energy store, you won't gain/lose performance from added weight, since it's directly related to the running of the engine. What you'll find is that it'll accelerate harder, but the inverse is true. It's also not great for the bearings to run super light flywheels. Not that the MX flywheel is super light.

                  Performance wise, I don't think they'll be much between the two.

                  Why wouldn't you just blank the Starter off and go with a kicker?

                  To get the electric starter working wouldn't require a lot at all. The starter is wired directly up to the battery and the Omron relay. The relay is wired directly to the battery also. The other side is just a 12 volt low current micro switch, could get a universal one and poll from the battery also. Shouldn't cost more than Β£10 to sort out.

                  The picks up are identical, I'm running an MX pick up on my RS, since my RS was one shagged.

                  What head was fitted to that big bore kit? if you got the engine cheap enough, the cylinder and head would be worth it alone. Starterm otors are cheap fortunately, and the flywheel and running gear can also be had cheap. Crank cases are well worth keeping though

                  Always Originate, Never Pirate!

                  NINJAN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • CalumC Calum

                    @NINJA Flywheel acts as an energy store, you won't gain/lose performance from added weight, since it's directly related to the running of the engine. What you'll find is that it'll accelerate harder, but the inverse is true. It's also not great for the bearings to run super light flywheels. Not that the MX flywheel is super light.

                    Performance wise, I don't think they'll be much between the two.

                    Why wouldn't you just blank the Starter off and go with a kicker?

                    To get the electric starter working wouldn't require a lot at all. The starter is wired directly up to the battery and the Omron relay. The relay is wired directly to the battery also. The other side is just a 12 volt low current micro switch, could get a universal one and poll from the battery also. Shouldn't cost more than Β£10 to sort out.

                    The picks up are identical, I'm running an MX pick up on my RS, since my RS was one shagged.

                    What head was fitted to that big bore kit? if you got the engine cheap enough, the cylinder and head would be worth it alone. Starterm otors are cheap fortunately, and the flywheel and running gear can also be had cheap. Crank cases are well worth keeping though

                    NINJAN Offline
                    NINJAN Offline
                    NINJA
                    wrote on last edited by NINJA
                    #9

                    @Calum It has the 140cc Italkit, with a single ring piston. This engine was rebuilt in 2013, fitted to an RS, started and ticked over but never ridden or ran-in, as that owner never finished off the project. So it's pretty much a new engine really. Sadly I can't return it so I need to sell it on to recover my expenditure. If I left it as a spare engine, or just donor parts it would really just be an expensive luxury collecting dust. It's better off with a new owner and someone who will enjoy it for-sure. πŸ˜‰

                    SEDUCED BY THE DARK SIDE!!!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NINJAN Offline
                      NINJAN Offline
                      NINJA
                      wrote on last edited by NINJA
                      #10

                      Update; I'll take some better pictures tomorrow, but here's how she looks today;

                      IMG_2633.JPG

                      IMG_2635.JPG

                      IMG_2636.JPG

                      She's all ready for sale now. πŸ˜‰

                      SEDUCED BY THE DARK SIDE!!!

                      CalumC 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • NINJAN NINJA

                        Update; I'll take some better pictures tomorrow, but here's how she looks today;

                        IMG_2633.JPG

                        IMG_2635.JPG

                        IMG_2636.JPG

                        She's all ready for sale now. πŸ˜‰

                        CalumC Offline
                        CalumC Offline
                        Calum
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @NINJA Hey, that's looking very tidy!

                        Always Originate, Never Pirate!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups